Jan 27, 2023
JUDGING GRADING CRITERIA
Each question will be able to gain up to 5 points, following the below criteria:
All the points in the question have been answered and tailored to the related award, the flow of the answer is clear, concise and easily understandable, data and examples provided are relevant and on point.
All the points in the question have been answered, data and examples provided are relevant, but language is fragmented, and clarity of the answer is affected.
Only around 2/3 of the question have been answered and the data and examples provided are not hat clear and on point; language is fragmented, and clarity of the answer is affected.
Less than half of the question have been answered and data and examples provided do not meet the standard expected to support the submission; language is fragmented, and clarity of the answer is affected.
The response is clearly the result of copy-paste from a corporate website, it hasn’t been thought through and adapted to the specific category/award, and/or the answer is not specific and targeted to the award's criteria, not reflecting the specifics of the category.
IMPORTANT: Nominations are confidential and none of the contents submitted will be shared publicly.